Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances Book 15, Page 112, No Ordinance NumberAN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF PADUCAH, KENTUCKY, BY ANNEXING CERTAIN PROPERTY LYING ADJACENT TO THE BLEST CORPORATE LIMITS OF SAID CITY, AND DEFINING ACCURATELY THE BOUNDARY OF SAID PROPERTY TO BE INCLUDED WITHIN SAID CORPORATE LIMITS WHEREAS under an ordinance adopted April 28, 1959, the City of Paducah, Kentucky, by and through its Board of Commissioners, proposed to extend the boundary of the city by annexing certain property lying adjacent to the west corporate limits of said city, and WHEREAS said ordinance proposing, such annexation and declaring the desirability and necessity of same was published in Ten (10) issued of the Sun -Democrat, a newspaper published and distributed in Paducah, Kentucky, during the period of thirty (30) days immediately after the enactment of said ordinance, and WHEREAS after the adoption of said ordinance and before the expiration of such thirty (30) day period, Tom Summers, a resident and a freeholder in said territory, and others filed a Complaint of Remonstrance in IvicCracken Circuit Court opposing such proposed annexation, and WHEREAS on July 12, 1963, and after the trial of the action, the Judge of the McCracken Circuit Court rendered a judFment ordering; the annexation of said property proposed to be annexed, which property is hereinafter more particularly and accurately described, and WHEREAS more than thirty (30) days has elapsed since the rendition and entry of said judgment in McCracken Circuit Court, and no appeal, nor notice of appeal, has been filed as required by the applicable law, and WHEREAS the Clerk of the McCracken Circuit Court has certified the Judgment rendered on July 12, 1963 to the Board of Commissioners of the City of Paducah, Kentucky. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF PADUCAH, KENTUCKY: SECTION 1. That the hereinafter described property be annexed to the City of Paducah, Kentucky, the same being more particularly and accurately described as follows: Beginning at a point in the present city limits line said point being the south east corner of the inter- section of Highland Boulevard and the Lone Oak Road (US 45); thence in a westerly direction and with the southerly property line of the Lone Oak Road to a point where the line dividing the property of Miller and Smith would, if extended, intersect the southerly property line of the Lone Oak Road; thence in a northerly direction and along said extended propert} line to the northerly property line of the Lone Oak Road; thence in an easterly direction and along the northerly property line of the Lone Oak Road to the line dividing, the property of Miller and Sanders 113 Arcadia Subdivision; thence in a northerly direction and along the line dividing the properties of Miller and Sanders Arcadia Subdivision to the northwest corner of Sanders Arcadia Subdivision, common corner to Barkley; thence with the line dividing the lands of Miller and Barkley, continuing; in a northerly direction, to the southerly property line of the Blandville Road; thence westerly along the southerly property line of the Blandville Road 'to a point where the easterly property line of Minerva Place (Forty -Third Street) would, if extended, intersect the southerly property line of said road; thence in a northerly direction and with the easterly prop- erty line of Minerva Place to a point in the present city limits, said point being 109' south of the south east corner of Minerva Place and Sunset Avenue; thence in an easterly direction and with the present city limits to the easterly property line of Cardinal Lane (Forty -Second Street); thence continuing with the present city limits in a northerly direction and along the easterly property line of Cardinal Lane (Forty -Second Street) to the south line of Lot 1, Block 6-- Minerva Place Addition; thence continuing with the present city limits in an easterly direction and with the south line of Lot 1 to the west line of Lot 7, Block 6 - Minerva Place Addition; thence con- tinuing with the present city limits in a southerly direction and with the west line of Lot 7 to the south west corner of Lot 7; thence continuing with the present city limits and with the south line of Lot 7 and 8 - Minerva Place Addition in an easterly direction to the east line of Block 6 - Minerva Place Addition; thence in a southerly direction and with the east line of Block 6 to the northerly property line of the Blandville Road; thence in an easterly direction and with the northerly property line of the Blandville Road 1001; thence in a northerly direction and parallel with the east line of Block 6, 369.23' to the south line of the Loveless property; thence in an easterly direction and with Loveless' sough line 123' to Loveless' southeast corner; thence in a northerly direction and with Loveless east line 130' to the present city limits; thence with the present city limits in an easterly direction to the center line of a 30' road, the northerly extension of said road dividing Blocks "F" and "E" Sunset Court Addition; thence continuing with the present city limits, in a southerly direction and with the center line of said road to the northerly property line of the Blandville Road; thence continuing with the present city limits in an easterly and southerly direction to the north- westerly line of Sanders Arcadia Subdivision; thence continuing with the present city limits in a south westerly and easterly direction to the westerly prop- erty line of the Lone Oak Road; thence continuing with the present city limits along the westerly and north- erly line of the Lone Oak Road to the westerly property line of Highland Boulevard if extended; thence contin- uing with the present city limits across the Lone Oak Road to the point of beginning. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its adoption. C. Winston Gho son, Mayor Pro em A. B. Fendley, COMwassioner Passed by the Board of Commissioners August 13, 1963 Recorded by Sarah Thurman, City Clerk, August 13, 1963.