HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances Book 13, Page 945, No Ordinance NumberAN ORDINANCE PROPOSING ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
LYING ADJACENT TO THE WEST CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF PADUCAH,
IENTUCKY; DEFINING ACCURATELY THE BOUNDARY OF SUCH TERRITORY TO BE
ANNEXED TO SAID CITY; AND DECLARING THE DESIRABILITY AND NECESSITY
OF SUCH ANNEXATION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COhMISSIONERS OF THE CITY
• OF PADUCAH, KENTUCKY:
SECTION 1. It is hereby proposed that certain territory
adjacent to the west corporate limits of the City of Paducah, Kentucky,
more particularly described hereinafter, be annexed to the City of
Paducah, Kentucky, and that said property so proposed to be annexed
is described as follows:
"Beginning at a point where the present city limits
intersects the north property line of Buckner Lane; thence in
a westerly direction and with the north property line of Buckner
Lane to a point where the west property line of Thurman?s Minerva
Place Addition would, if extended, intersect the north property
line of Buckner Lane; thence with the.west property line of
Minerva Place Addition, if extended, in a southerly direction
to the south property line of Buckner Lane; thence continuing
with the west property line of Minerva Place Addition, in a
southerly direction, to a point 75.121 south of the south prop-
erty line of Sunset Avenue; thence in an easterly direction and
along a line parallel with Sunset Avenue to a point in the west
property line of Minerva Place or 43rd street, said point being
751 south of the southwest corner of the intersection of Minerva
Place and Sunset Avenue; thence at right angles in a southerly
direction and along the west property line of Minerva Place 342;
thence at right angles in an easterly direction, 109' from and
parallel with Sunset Avenue, to the east property line of Cardinal
Lane or 42nd Street; thence in a southerly direction and with the
east property line of Cardinal Lane to the line dividing Lots 1
and 2 Block 6 Minerva Place Addition; thence in an easterly
direction with the south line of Lot 1 Block 6, a distance of
174.35'; thence at right angles in a southerly direction with
the side or west line of Lot 7 Block 6 and the rear or east
lines of Lots 2 and 3 Block 6, a distance of 1341, to the south
west corner of Lot 7 Block 6; thence in an easterly direction
and with the rear or south line of Lots 7 and 8 Block 6, 121.551;
thence in a northerly direction and with the side of east line
of Lot 8 Block 6, to a point 101.11 from the south property line
of Sunset Avenue, said point being in the southwest corner of
Lot 23 Block F, Sunset Court Addition; thence in an easterly
direction and along the south line of Block F, Sunset Court
Addition, a distance of 593.6? to the center line of a 30t road;
thence in a southerly direction and with the center line of said
road to the present city limits; thence with the present city
limits to the point of beginning on Buckner Lane.
SECTION 2. It is hereby declared that extending the boundary
of the City of Paducah, Kentucky by annexing the property described
in Section 1 hereof is desirable and necessary.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be published in at least ten
(10) issues of the Sun democrat, a newspaper in Paducah, Kentucky,
and the extension of the city limits as herein proposed shall not
become effective until the adoption of an ordinance annexing the
property described in Section 1 hereof as herein proposed, and such
ordinance shall not be adopted until publication of this ordinance
as provided herein and until the expiration of a period of thirty
(30) days after the passage of this ordinance.
946
Notice is hereby given of a provision in Section 81.110 of
Krntucky Revised Statutes that one or more residents or freeholders
of the herein territory proposed to be annexed may, within thirty
(30) days after the enactment of this ordinance, file a petition in
the Circuit Court of 1.1cCracken County, Kentucky, setting forth
the reasons why such territory, or any part of it, should not be
annexed.
SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its adoption.
Haley LHook,f•layor Pro Tem
(• Lf/� 4_�.--t' lam_
C. W. G olson, Commissioner
Passed by the Board of Commissioners August 28, 1958
Recorded by Sarah Thurman, City Clerk, August 28, 1958.